Description

The Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) is due to publish its primary science guidance report.
Katie Luxton’s article describes the process of systematic review that the EEF has adopted to answer the question: ‘What approaches are most effective to improve pupil outcomes in primary science, in what context, and how?’ She highlights the problems of bias when looking for appropriate evidence and the approaches they have used to mitigate this.

More from this issue

Tina Whittaker’s article describes how the Science Across the City project, based in Stoke-on-Trent, has created a non-hierarchical community of...

Journal Article

Stuart Naylor, writing on behalf of the ASE Mary Anning Project team, discusses the evaluation of a set of teaching resources that have been...

Journal Article

Jane Essex’s article looks at the tensions that trainee teachers can face when being asked to promote a rigorous science education based on...

Journal Article