Joining up the thinking: how science'learning progressions' could address problems inherent in primary secondary transition
Issue 362 | Page 39 | Published Sep 2016
Description
Dips in pupils' science attitudes and performance when they transfer from primary to secondary school in England are well established. They have been related to a variety of factors, including repetition of science content at year 7 and differences in the pedagogical approaches taken by primary and secondary teachers. One potential way forward would be to use data from research studies that have surveyed how pupils' science thinking develops across key stage 2 (7- to 11-year-olds) and key stage 3 (11- to 14-year-olds). These'learning progressions' can provide continuity that takes into account pupils' changing science concepts over the transfer period and so help ease transition.
More from this issue
Peter Borrows discusses how ink was manufactured centuries ago and challenges us to reproduce the method in modern times.
This article reviews the use of'bridging units' in science to improve curriculum continuity during transition from primary to secondary...
The issues and challenges for pupils and teachers raised and discussed in this special issue of School Science Review on science during primary...