Do we have a cognitive (psychology) overload? What could the 'Learning Sciences' mean for primary science education? (McMahon)
Issue 90 | Page 34 | Published Nov 2021
Description
This article unpicks the research behind Ofsted's review of research. The author suggests that adopting a wider view of the 'learning sciences', which includes findings from neuroscience, may be necessary for moving forward conversations about science education. She stresses the importance of language, emotions, hands-on learning and enquiry in primary science.
More from this issue
Pete provides a fascinating reprise of a memorable session presented by Dr. Nasima Hassan, Maaria Ahmad and Romaiza Nassim, relating experiences...
The author challenges us to consider the purpose of a curriculum for science. She proposes an argument for science education where the rationale...
Felicia Mensah, from Columbia University, discusses her work with future teacher educators and how she helped them to engage in conversations...